positive feedback

In Today's lesson we went around the classroom giving feedback to each other's thrillers.
I am writing out the positive feedback:


How varied did you find our camera work?

• 1st group said "Very good rang of shots and very experimental."
• 2nd group said " Very very good variety of shots and experimental. I liked he 'kiss' shot." (It's not a kiss shot though, It's Tarkwin blowing)
• 3rd group said " Lots of close ups and we liked the close up of Tarkwin blowing dust."

• 4th group said "Good use of shots."

Do you understand what's happening with he parallel editing?

• 1st group didn't say anything (we don't think they know what parallel editing is.)
• 2nd group said " The piece works well."
• 3rd and 4th group did not say anything nice. :(

Did you think the setting/mise-en-scene etc was appropriate and why?

• 1st group said " Setting is in the woods is 'good'."
• 2nd group said " Good use of props, mask and flower. good settings for a thriller."
• 3rd group said " It's very abstract and good lighting."
• 4th group didn't say anything nice again...
  

Did the structure make the story line clear?

• Only the 2nd group had a nice response which was " A bit unclear but that's normal for a thriller as all shall be explained in the rest of the film."

What do you think of the titles? do you think they look good on stills?

• Very simple, works well with footage
• Simplistic which works
• Titels were plain, quite simple - worked well.

SOUND

• Good audio
• sound worked well.